Talk:Nick Bolkus
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nick Bolkus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (centre, colour, realise, program, travelled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NPOV issues
[edit]This article has some serious NPOV issues. This is someone with a quarter-century career of public service, and yet the vast majority of his article focuses on a single scandal. I recognize that this was the material that was most easily Googled, but the result is something that reads like an attack page with a stub wrapped around it. We desperately need to expand the remaining sections here. Phil Sandifer 15:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Perhaps someone could use or to do this expansion? Phil Sandifer 13:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yes one could argue the scandal section has undue weight, if it remains an issue use that template instead. NPOV template removed. - RoyBoy 23:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
[edit]This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 00:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Revertion of IP edit
[edit]I reverted this edit because it deleted critical material, which was well sourced (at least in regard to the scandal), without any attempt to improve it. To say that the scandal is only a small part of his life, should mean that the material should be added to redress the balance, not wholesale deletion of critical material (including the comment that he had only briefly worked as a lawyer, which it is hard to see as being as "semi-libelous").Grahamec 02:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use Australian English
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Mid-importance Australia articles
- Start-Class South Australia articles
- Low-importance South Australia articles
- WikiProject South Australia articles
- Start-Class Australian politics articles
- Low-importance Australian politics articles
- WikiProject Australian politics articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Start-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles



