Talk:Nicholas Hoult
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nicholas Hoult article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
| This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| Nicholas Hoult is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 28, 2024. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Edit-warring editor
[edit]Editor Nottedeluce is edit-warring at this Featured Article to restore his badly written, misformatted version. English is not his native tongue, and he's introduced many blatant grammatical and style errors, such as redundancies and italicizing quotations. Another editor helpfully fixed the text, correcting the errors and fixing the badly written English, and was instantly reverted.
I started fixing his errors manually, and quickly realized that there were too many to make it worthwhile, so I restored the good version, only to see it instantly reverted. At this point, within a couple of hours he's reverted me twice, and the other editor once, leaving such edit summaries as his last: "My English is not correct. It is not my native language. For me it is a good article. DON'T DISREGARD THE WORK OF OTHERS!!" He's getting out of hand. Carlstak (talk) 22:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- I have warned the editor in question. We probably need to revert back to the Dec 9 version to undo the questionable changes. —Joeyconnick (talk) 03:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- I share Carlstak's concern and concur with Joeyconnick's suggestion to revert, which I did just now. The article is now back to this version. The issues with Nottedeluce's edits were too great to let slide. KyleJoantalk 09:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- I've notified an admin of Nottedeluce's behavior, including the five reverts he's made so far in less than 24 hours. If he continues his edit-warring, we should get some action to stop the nonsense. Carlstak (talk) 17:18, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Returning to the article is throwing away all the work and time of several users, invested in making a good and updated article Nottedeluce (talk) 12:46, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Volver a esa edición del 9 de septiembre, es dejar un artículo que no es neutro y desactualizado. Nottedeluce (talk) 12:45, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- I share Carlstak's concern and concur with Joeyconnick's suggestion to revert, which I did just now. The article is now back to this version. The issues with Nottedeluce's edits were too great to let slide. KyleJoantalk 09:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- "it's getting out of hand" when all I'm trying to do is make a good article Nottedeluce (talk) 12:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'm going to continue editing the article. Providing true data and information to create a good final article.
- I will do it little by little, over the days, so that you have time to read and verify that it is true and neutral.
- I start today with a small part. I have as much right as you to write. and I have you not blocked it. You block me because you hate that I change the article. Nottedeluce (talk) 12:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- First, this is English Wikipedia, and if you're going to use the talk page you have to use English, not Spanish. You call yourself a new Wikipedian, but your own talk page shows that you've had a WP account since 2015—eight years ago. When you make major changes to an established article, especially a Featured one, you need to propose on this talk page the changes you want to make, and discuss them with other editors who might object to them, or who may suggest modifications to your proposal. These changes are subject to consensus, and you have to gain a consensus before you make those changes to the article, or they may be reverted by any other editor.
- You just got off a 24-hour block, and the first thing you do is leave a note here accusing another editor with the words, "You block me because you hate that I change the article", then you make substantial changes to the lede, without consulting other editors. That's not a good start, and doesn't bode well for your continuing to edit WP. Continue with this behavior, and you will very likely be blocked indefinitely. Carlstak (talk) 14:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 28 January 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change the installments with one L to two, second paragraph last sentence: "He played the mutant Beast (Hank McCoy) in the 2011 superhero film X-Men: First Class, a role he reprised in later instalments of the film series." Carbonear-Trinity-Bay de Verde (talk) 20:14, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Not done: This is correct for British English, which is used for this article. RudolfRed (talk) 22:01, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
FA Article
[edit]I would like to request that this article be reverted to an earlier version. The recent edits made by a new contributor contain unreliable or non-verifiable sources, and the tone does not meet Wikipedia's standards for neutrality and encyclopedic style. 164.215.143.47 (talk) 06:44, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, the article reeks of ChatGPT, and I've tagged the article accordingly. Here are some diffs:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nicholas_Hoult&diff=prev&oldid=1304809485
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nicholas_Hoult&diff=prev&oldid=1304810883
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nicholas_Hoult&diff=prev&oldid=1305315861
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nicholas_Hoult&diff=prev&oldid=1305316040
- A choice quote from the first diff:
He also featured in Owen Harris’s dark comedy Kill Your Friends (2015), based on the 2008 novel of the same name. Hoult portrays Steven Stelfox, an executive in the music industry during the 1990s in London. The film is a dark satire about fierce competition and corruption in the music industry, with Stelfox's character at the center of this critique, displaying his arrogant personality and growing dehumanization throughout the story.
It's 70% fluff and refers to "Stelfox's character" (the character is Stelfox). Ursus arctos californicus (talk) 23:05, 21 September 2025 (UTC)- I would agree and support a restore to an earlier version. It's unfortunate these additions to a prior FA were allowed to remain or went unnoticed. Nubzor [T][C] 18:48, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 2 September 2026
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Nicholas Hoult has three children. His third child was born in late 2025 or early 2026, because his wife Bryana Holly alluded to having a newborn at home after her Oscar party appearance with Hoult. ~2026-47733-07 (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want made. crtbob@talk:~$ ls contribs 12:26, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- Biography articles of living people
- FA-Class biography articles
- FA-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Mid-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- FA-Class Berkshire articles
- Low-importance Berkshire articles
- WikiProject Berkshire articles and lists
