Talk:Nev Pask

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Australia: Queensland Low‑importance

	Australia portal Nev Pask is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

The subject of the article is one of the wealthiest property developers in Australia, whose daughter has married a prominent figure in Australian politics. Seems pretty notable to me. Please check the sources before suggesting articles be deleted. --Johnnyturk888 (talk) 15:10, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. I'm going to remove the deletion tag. Smartse (talk) 15:14, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it had no citations, I tagged the article for help instead. T3chl0v3r (talk) 15:18, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

The article when you proposed it for deletion did have citations and continues to expand its number of solid sources. Suggesting articles for deletion so hastily is not preferred. Please don't do it again. --Johnnyturk888 (talk) 15:29, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply