This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism
I disagree with the idea that ViaMichelin should be merged with Michelin. None of the other subsidiaries of Michelin have been merged with the main page, so it seems perfectly fine to leave ViaMichelin with its own page on Wikipedia. Also, there is already a subsection on the Michelin page called "Online mapping" that includes a summary of (and link to) the ViaMichelin page. RBRust (talk) 00:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. ViaMichelin satisfies GNG easily and by a wide margin. It has received significant coverage in many books and periodicals, including many entire articles about it. In addition to the sources added to the article today, there is more coverage in Google Books, in the Internet Archive, and in newpapers etc. The article is not promotional, and now actually includes negative criticism from reliable newspapers, and cites negative critical reviews in reliable publications. James500 (talk) 14:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
michellin don't manufacture tyres for the space shuttle. It should be in past tense, or more realistically not included in the list (especially not first) Pigsnoutman (talk) 10:26, 15 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.jpg){kind=small}
