Talk:Mackinawite
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 7 months ago by ~2026-91440-6 in topic Not smithite but smythite!
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chemical formula
[edit]- References:
- "The structure of disordered mackinawite". American Mineralogist. 88: 2007–2015. 2003.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|authors=ignored (help) - "Surface chemistry of disordered mackinawite (FeS)". Geochemica et Cosmochimica Acta. 69: 3469–3481. 2005.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|authors=ignored (help) - "The composition of nanoparticulate mackinawite, tetragonal iron(II) monosulfide". Chemical Geology. 235: 286–298. 15 December 2006.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|authors=ignored (help) - Chemical formulas: mindat.org ((Fe,Ni)9S8); IMA Master List (09.2012) and rruff.info/ima/ ((Fe,Ni)1+xS (x = 0-0.07)), Mineralienatlas ((Fe,Ni)9S8), Handbook of Mineralogy ((Fe,Ni)1+xS (x = 0 to 0.11))
- --Chris.urs-o (talk) 20:17, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Wrong formula
[edit]The formula is wrong. The correct formula is FeS. ALWAYS use MINDAT for CORRECT mineralogical data. Eudialytos ~2026-91440-6 (talk) 17:46, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
Not smithite but smythite!
[edit]This error clearly shows that a chemist should cooperate with a mineralogist... Smithite is a silver thioarsenite. Smythite is an iron sulfide. ALWAYS use MINDAT for CORRECT mineralogical data ... Eudialytos ~2026-91440-6 (talk) 17:49, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Rocks and minerals articles
- Low-importance Rocks and minerals articles
- Low-importance Stub-Class Rocks and minerals articles
- WikiProject Rocks and minerals articles
- Stub-Class Geology articles
- Low-importance Geology articles
- Low-importance Stub-Class Geology articles
- Stub-Class Meteorites articles
- Mid-importance Meteorites articles
- Meteorites articles
- WikiProject Geology articles
