Jump to content

Talk:Livingston Island

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Otr500 in topic Article concerns

Smolensk

[edit]

'Livingston Island' is the official Russian name of the island, not 'Smolensk'. Reference: The authoritative international registry SCAR Composite Gazetteer of Antarctica. The Russians in the South Shetland Islands also use in practice the present official Russian names which are those given by the early English and American sealers. The old Russian names given by the imperial expedition of Bellingshausen and Lazarev never became established. All nations in the archipelago use the same names (excepting the Argentines who use '25 de Mayo' for King George Island but that name has not been accepted by other nations). Apcbg 23:27, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Livingston Island. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:55, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Article concerns

[edit]
This article has potential. Below are some things that can be considered: Sometimes, incremental edits can go a little overboard. Maybe a review for some improvements would be beneficial. This will become more important when an otherwise good article is considered for promotion.
  • Images: There are 33 images in the article before getting to the 30 in the "Gallery" section. Although pictures are worth a thousand words, that does not mean an article needs to be inundated with these images that, #1)- Are, or can be, covered in the article about the subject, possibly with some prose and a link, as #2)- Wikipedia is not intended to be an "art gallery" for all things that are, #3-tangentially related.
  • Sourcing: There are sentences and entire paragraphs that are unsourced, do not have inline citations, and follows a practice of adding material after a link. Content that delves deeper than "the sky is blue", or falls under sourcing guidelines that reflect policy, then said content should be sourced usually by an inline citation: Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space. The "Inline citation" subsection states they are "required" for " featured articles, good articles, and A-class articles". This can appear somewhat misleading because, as written, it seems to conflict with policies and guidelines. The B-class criteria #1: The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which (editor added: "that") is likely to be challenged is cited.
  • Appendices: There are 43 items in the appendices, that includes the "See also" (13), Maps (19), "In popular culture" (5), and "Bibliography" (6) sections, not counting the seven links in the External links. A review might determine some excess material that can be trimmed or otherwise added to the article in prose. -- Otr500 (talk) 14:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)Reply