Talk:Kfar Aza
Add topic | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
| Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the Arab–Israeli conflict.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Malicious Article Vandalism Relating to Sources Countering Claims of Executed/Beheaded Babies
[edit]Users are removing/revising edits to this article that cite news reports that debunk or oppose a viral narrative of 40 beheaded babies being discovered in this settlement. Previous versions of the article include citations referring to direct interviews with Israeli Army officials stating that they have no confirmation of such accounts.
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/israeli-army-says-it-does-not-have-confirmation-about-allegations-that-hamas-beheaded-babies-/3014787 2601:644:8584:2800:31EB:8517:D80A:4D8B (talk) 23:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Rather than fight over phrasing on the article I have simply removed the original dubious reference and warned the relevant editors over their article vandalism for revising prior versions of this article without citation or substantiation for their claims of fake news and anti-Semitism. 2601:644:8584:2800:31EB:8517:D80A:4D8B (talk) 00:15, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
The article is heavily politicised
[edit]The article is is heavily weighing towards one side of a controversy and has no real historical data on the establishment of the kibbutz. Instead it is evident that it is written exactly for putting through an one-sided view on a controversial fact that has not yet been fully investigated and given the fact that the impacted side is the one with the power over press and judiciary authorities, I'm inclined to believe that it will never be further investigated. Proposing to balance the article with more data as to the how the kibbutz was established, main events that happened throughout its 72 year history what it produced and how it was run. You only imply that the first inhabitants were in fact trained soldiers but say nothing more on that. 141.237.3.47 (talk) 14:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC)