Jump to content

Talk:Jenova Chen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Rjanag in topic Advert-like
Good articleJenova Chen has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 14, 2011Good article nomineeListed
July 8, 2011Featured topic candidatePromoted
February 8, 2020Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 11, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Jenova Chen designs video games such as Flow and Flower so that they appeal to universal emotions rather than specific cultures?
Current status: Good article

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Jenova Chen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:52, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
[edit]

Does anyone else have the impression that the article (particularly the first and last paragraphs of the lede) read a bit like an advertisement? It's not egregious, and it seems to all be appropriately sourced to reliable sources, but nevertheless it does have a gushy, praising tone that doesn't feel quite encyclopedic to me. Would it be worthwhile to attempt to tone it down a bit? rʨanaɢ (talk) 12:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply