Talk:International School of Choueifat

Untitled

Fix the references ...and then resubmit to the schools project. we can help Victuallers 11:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Stubbed

Due to a WP:OTRS complaint, the article has been stubbed because portions of it are inaccurate and it lacks references. You may rebuild the article if you wish provided that a reference to a reliable source is used for each assertion. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 19:00, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Original research

This article seriously needs citations from reliable sources and references. Most of the information in the article is basically original research. It also needs to be cleaned up a bit and made more NPOV. Tagged. ← ANAS ^Talk? 19:13, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Choueifat.gif

Image:Choueifat.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Bias?

It seems that someone here is extremely biased. Me and others have tried editing the article impartially, however, our contributions are erased in a matter of minutes.

I am a student at this school, I know what I'm talking about. So can this individual just cut it out? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loraes (talk • contribs) 18:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Your edits have to conform to Wikipedia policy. You must provide reliable secondary sources for the information you add to the article -- this isn't an optional rule. You may not add information from your personal experiences; this is discussed in full at WP:OR. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's editing policies. Shell ^babelfish 18:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Final Edit

We should render a final edit as per 103-UC-001 and consider the logistics as final. Address me wherein the futher edits may be required.

Please remember: legacy is vital. Thanks. Jjsmal (talk) 08:11, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia articles are living documents; I'm not sure what you're referring to, but there's no such thing as a "final edit". Cheers. DonIago (talk) 18:56, 27 September 2019 (UTC)