Jump to content

Talk:House of Nassau

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by AndyTheGrump in topic Suggestion for Surname Etymology Update: Dietz
[edit]

I have just modified 2 external links. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Descendants

[edit]

Is it true Rutger Corné Heinsius and Linde Irmgard Heinsius, who nowadays are a rare species out from the Houses of Bourbon, Habsburg, Arragon, Heinaut and Hohenstaufen, beside all the others, also earn the title Count(ess) of Nassau-Lijfland?

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:15, 14 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:52, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:52, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:58, 5 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

the "Subject/Headline" or "Section title")

[edit]

Hi all,

If we are discussing evidence, we need to look at what is currently on the article page. Right now, the "History" section makes major chronological claims without listing any footnotes, references, or archives to show where that information came from.

As editors, we shouldn't just rely on text someone typed onto the internet years ago without checking the paperwork. The published record (Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie, Volume 14, page 256) explicitly contradicts the current text regarding the 1559 and 1606 dates.

Can anyone point to the specific historical source, archive, or document that backs up the current text on the page? If there is no source material or paperwork indicating where that information was gotten from, we should update the section using the verified German biographical records we have right now. Dietz2003 (talk) 01:11, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

This page doesn't have a history section...
Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 08:32, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

[1]

Let me know how it goes or if you want to double-check the exact phrasing for the main article edit itself! Dietz2003 (talk) 23:49, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. von Landmann, Karl (1881). Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie. Vol. 14. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot. p. 256.

Subject: Formal Challenge Regarding

[edit]

Missing Primary Evidence for Nassau-Dietz Lineage and Shipping Records

To the Editors and Administrators of Wikipedia,

I am writing to formally challenge the lack of physical, primary evidence on your platform regarding the documentation of family lineages, specifically concerning the House of Nassau-Dietz and corresponding immigration records.

Your platform presents information in a format designed to look like an official, verified dictionary of history. However, you are displaying typed text and public announcements without showing or linking to the actual physical books, original paperwork, or manufactured records where this data supposedly originates. Anyone can type text onto a screen, but text is not proof.

Specifically, I am demanding to know where the actual evidence is regarding the following:

  1. The House of Nassau-Dietz: You host extensive text entries regarding the succession, titles, and records of this princely house, yet you fail to display the actual, physical civil registry volumes, royal decrees, or official heraldry books that verify these lines and their connections to migrating families.
  2. The SS Scythia Manifest (1891): While your platform frequently references immigration timelines and historical dates, you completely lack the actual physical paperwork—such as the official passenger arrival manifest for the SS Scythia arriving in Boston in 1891, which explicitly documents the arrival of Frederick William Dietz and his son. You do not show the original ink signatures, the captain's ledger, or the official government port stamps.

If Wikipedia claims to be an accurate historical resource, you cannot rely on secondary public announcements or unverified digital text while hiding the actual physical artifacts. Where are the physical copies? Where are the scanned pages of the real books?

I am requesting a formal response detailing exactly why these primary, physical documents are missing from your entries, and where the raw, underlying evidence is being kept to justify the family connections you display.

Sincerely,

Jason Dietz Dietz2003 (talk) 00:26, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Official Correction Request and Lineage Evidence Challenge: Nassau-Dietz Lineage to Dietz

[edit]

To the Editors and Administrators of Wikipedia,

I am writing to submit a formal correction and challenge to the historical lineage records currently presented on your platform. Your site hosts unverified text that completely cuts off family lines—specifically claiming that certain historical figures died by drowning and left behind absolutely no heirs—while completely missing the actual physical paperwork that tracks the true, surviving descent.

You are treating unverified summaries like an official, closed dictionary, while entirely hiding the raw, underlying evidence from view. You must account for the primary evidence, manufactured records, and ship manifests that document the following direct, interconnected timeline of descent:

  • Henry Casimir I (Count of Nassau-Dietz) — January 21, 1612 – July 13, 1640
  • Henry Casimir II (Prince of Nassau-Dietz) — January 18, 1657 – March 25, 1696
  • John William Friso (Prince of Orange / House of Nassau-Dietz) — August 14, 1687 – July 14, 1711
    • Note on Correction: Your platform claims he tragically drowned in 1711 and left no heirs behind. I am directly challenging this narrative with the historical fact that he had a baby in Germany, ensuring his line directly continued. Your records completely erase this child and close off lineages based on incomplete data rather than physical proof. The line continued directly down through the following heirs:
  • Prince William (Dietz / D-i-t-z)
  • Frederick William Dietz
  • Frederick William Dietz (D-i-t-z)Age 28, arriving from Prussia, Germany. Documented directly on the manufactured, government-stamped historical record: the official passenger arrival manifest for the SS Scythia, which docked at the Port of Boston on July 6, 1891.
  • Frederick William Dietz (D-i-t-z)Age 2, son traveling with his father from Prussia, Germany on the same July 6, 1891 SS Scythia manifest.
  • Frank Dietz

Your platform relies on secondary typed summaries and public announcements that completely fail to display the actual physical books, civil registries, or maritime ledgers verifying this sequence. By stating as a fact that certain lines ended without heirs, you are actively ignoring the physical copies and ink-on-paper signatures that prove otherwise.

Where is your physical evidence to deny this direct line? A text entry typed onto a screen is not proof. I am demanding that Wikipedia either provide scanned, page-by-page visual proof of the original historical books to justify your current narrative, or update your platform to accurately reflect this documented lineage.

Sincerely,

Jason Dietz Dietz2003 (talk) 00:34, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion for Surname Etymology Update: Dietz

[edit]

Hello,

I am writing to suggest an addition to the Wikipedia page for the surname "Dietz."

Currently, the page would benefit from a precise breakdown of the name's historical etymology. The surname Dietz is a well-documented derivative of the old Germanic given name Theodoric (or Dietrich). This name is composed of two distinct Proto-Germanic elements:

  • "theud" (meaning people or tribe)
  • "ric" (meaning ruler, king, or power)

Combined, the literal historical meaning of the surname translates directly to "ruler of the people."

I would like to request that this etymological definition and its linguistic roots be added to the origin section of the Dietz surname page to provide readers with a complete historical context.

Thank you for your time and for maintaining this resource.

Sincerely,

Jason Dietz Dietz2003 (talk) 00:48, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have new information I would like to show you what I found what I learned I'm not going to post this I just want you guys to check it out and see if I'm correct cuz this is my family history and I want it to be accurate so I'm going to show you this what I found Dietz2003 (talk) 23:02, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply


"Historical Connection: The Dietz Family Migration (Prussia to Massachusetts)

1. The Immigrant Generation (The 1881 Ship Crossing)

In 1881, a closely linked family group of young adults emigrated from Prussia, Germany, arriving in Massachusetts to work in the booming local industrial mills. According to the 1900 U.S. Federal Census records for Middlesex County (Saugus/Malden), this family group settled tightly on Lawrence Street and included:

  • William Dietz (b. September 1853, Prussia) – Head of household, listed as a shoemaker/rubber worker.
  • Sophia Dietz (b. May 1856, Germany) – Wife of William, emigrated alongside him in 1881.
  • Charles Dietrich/Dietz (b. October 1855, Germany) – Living nearby on Lawrence Street, emigrated in 1881, rubber worker.
  • Frederick Dietrich/Dietz (b. January 1863, Germany) – Living nearby on Lawrence Street, emigrated in 1881, rubber worker.

2. The American-Born Generation

Once settled in Massachusetts, William and Sophia expanded their family. Their children represent the first generation of this line born in the United States:

  • Albert F. Dietz (b. December 1888, Massachusetts)
  • Frederick W. Dietz (b. June 1896, Massachusetts) – Great-grandfather line.

The Nassau-Diez (Prussia) Geographic Link

The reason these ancestors are listed as being from Prussia in U.S. records, but connect directly to the history of Nassau-Dietz, is due to changing political borders:

  • The Homeland: The family roots trace back to the historic territories of the Principality of Nassau-Diez (Hesse-Nassau region).
  • The Prussian Annexation (1866): When William Dietz was approximately 13 years old, the Kingdom of Prussia annexed the Duchy of Nassau following the Austro-Prussian War.
  • The Record Result: Because their homeland became a Prussian province, William and his brothers identified their birth country as 'Prussia' or 'Germany' on U.S. Census documents, while carrying the distinct regional surname Dietz tied to their ancestral geography.

Source Citations:

  • 1900 United States Federal Census: Massachusetts, Middlesex County, Saugus Township, Enumeration District 821, Sheet 7B (Lines 26–31) and Sheet 11A (Lines 21–24).
  • Historical Context: Prussian Annexation of Nassau-Hesse, 1866."

Dietz2003 (talk) 23:02, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

do you guys think about this this is how I am connecting to the house of Nassau Dietz I've been using ancestry.com and also marriage records obituaries tax records and senses records this is where I've been getting my information from his ancestry.com I have all the information My grandfather's veteran card when he signed up for the military I have other information when he left the military the address he left lived at and where he grew up and every single document every single information that's out there I just wanted to share with you guys to let you know I am connected to the house of NASA needs and I'm connected also to the Spencer family princess Diana was my cousin because my grandmother Eileen Topping her mother was a Gordon a Spencer married into the Gordon family and that's how princess Diana was my cousin and that's how I'm connected to the lake Queen of England I'm not right and random stuff I'm showing you the facts that I was trying to show you before but you guys weren't listening to me you guys just didn't want to hear me or you didn't want to hear what I had to say I give you my information where the ship manifest how Frederick William d i t z age 28 left Germany with his son age 2 and his name is also Frederick William d i t z and this is the same Frederick I just found just now on ancestry.com it is on the census bracket of the address my grandfather loved that the same person that came off the ship

Dietz2003 (talk) 23:06, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia content is required to be directly verifiable in published reliable sources. Since no such sources are provided, none of the above is of the slightest relevance to us. AndyTheGrump (talk) 02:41, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply