Jump to content

Talk:Health Star Rating System

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by ~2026-52519-32 in topic Tim Tams

Nestle

[edit]

add more information regarding Nestle cases, e.g. from their internal presentation being cited: "only 37 per cent of Nestle's food and beverages by revenues, excluding products such as pet food and specialised medical nutrition, achieve a rating above 3.5 under Australia's health star rating system" https://news.slashdot.org/story/21/05/31/1836255/nestle-document-says-majority-of-its-food-portfolio-is-unhealthy original (paywalled) source: https://www.ft.com/content/4c98d410-38b1-4be8-95b2-d029e054f492

Jaleks (talk) 19:14, 31 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tim Tams

[edit]

Someone keeps adding Tim Tams to the article. I have removed it multiple times as it doesn't seem particularly relevant or notable. Would love any other opinions. Hanne Thato (talk) 07:54, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

我确实支持将其纳入这篇文章中,因为另一篇链接至此文的文章中已包含了这一内容。 ~2026-27113-25 (talk) 08:12, 5 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Agree, Tim Tam anecdote is a bit random and is unnecessary. I note the above comment in Chinese ("I do support including it in this article, since another article that links to this one already contains this content."); I'm not sure which article that is but ok. The rating is not in doubt (0.5 stars), is not surprising, and is not controversial. It did not attract media scrutiny (unlike Milo). The 'media attention' was just two media outlets picking up on a Reddit discussion about Tim Tams displaying 0.5 stars. At the time, the HSR system was relatively new and it seems a handful of people took to Reddit to voice their confusion about why it would display the star rating. ~2026-52519-32 (talk) 23:24, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply