Jump to content

Talk:Harrison Fields

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 18 days ago by ThadeusOfNazereth in topic GA review

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Harrison Fields/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: ElijahPepe (talk · contribs) 04:20, 29 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: ThadeusOfNazereth (talk · contribs) 21:08, 19 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

ff

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, grammar, and understandability): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, lists, and tables):
    Did some very minor copy-editing but there was nothing major. Normally I would suggest moving something like the marriage to "Personal life," but it's basically the only thing in the article that would fit there so I think it's fine where it is.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
    Did some light citation cleanup as part of the copy-edit. One minor sourcing issues - First, in the infobox, it says he has an "MA," but I don't see that in the university source (Ross 23).
    This was resolved. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 18:34, 21 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    This seems fine - I did a search and didn't see any kind of notable new role since leaving the White House. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 16:50, 20 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    No issues. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 16:50, 20 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    No issues. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 16:50, 20 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions and alt text):
    No issues. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 16:50, 20 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    This article is very close, with just one minor sourcing issue to fix before it'll be good to go! ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 16:50, 20 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Fixed. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 02:13, 21 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
    All good! ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 18:34, 21 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.