Talk:Gurney equations

Explosives Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Military history. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Minor edits to Gurney page

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I added some clarification to the section on fragmenting vs non-fragmenting materials and added content to help the reader visualize why velocities on fragmenting materials are only about 80% of Gurney-predicted velocities. Also cleaned up some wording and punctuation. DoktorScience (talk) 03:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply