Talk:Future predator
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 1 month ago by BilledMammal in topic Requested move 29 July 2026
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| On 29 July 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from Future predator to Future predator (Primeval). The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Why is this disambigged?
[edit]We don't have any other page called "Future Predator"... StrexcorpEmployee (talk) 17:43, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
NVM I fixed it myself as per WP:BOLD. StrexcorpEmployee (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Requested move 29 July 2026
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 03:21, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Future predator → Future predator (Primeval) – I disagree that this page needs no disambiguation. "Future predator" can potentially refer to a creature extrapolated in speculative evolution and should either be redirected there as primary topic or a DAB page created. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:21, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- Leaning opposed. This seems like speculative disambiguation. The article about speculative evolution does not mention "Future predator". Although one could envision future predators as being part of speculative evolution, or even as being part of actual future evolution, there is no real in-depth discussion of those hypothetical future predator subjects on Wikipedia. — BarrelProof (talk) 03:18, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment Is there evidence of reliable secondary sources actually using the specific term "future predator" in reference to the other meaning suggested above? 162 etc. (talk) 17:04, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- I'd invoke WP:SURPRISE regardless of whether there is evidence that the term is used in reliable sources. Common sense dictates that sending people searching for it here would be surprising. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:18, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose, no evidence of ambiguity with any real-life topic. 162 etc. (talk) 17:44, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- B-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- B-Class British television articles
- Unknown-importance British television articles
- British television task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- B-Class fictional character articles
- WikiProject Fictional characters articles
- B-Class science fiction articles
- Low-importance science fiction articles
- WikiProject Science Fiction articles
