Jump to content

Talk:Flora Largo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 hours ago by Krisgabwoosh in topic GA review

GA review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Flora Largo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Krisgabwoosh (talk · contribs) 04:29, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: ThaddeusOrlando55 (talk · contribs) 00:01, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello again. It has been a while. I believe that this is the first biographical article of yours that I shall be reviewing. I shall begin my review shortly. ThaddeusOrlando55 (talk) 00:01, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Images

[edit]

One image, a photo of the subject. The licensing checks out.

Sources

[edit]

Twelve sources. Three web pages, six news articles, and three books. Nothing problematic. One thing I will note is that for the news articles with identifiable authors, you still cite the newspapers' names, like the La Prensa and La Jornada articles. I'd suggest you cite the author's names, but I will leave it up to you.

Grammar, prose, etc.

[edit]
  • For the family name footnote, you use Spanish as the language, but since Largo is Bolivian I believe it is now custom to use Hispanic American as the language. See for example Rodrigo Paz.
  • In 2009, her party ran her for a proportional representation seat representing Potosí Department, which she won. I think that should be "representing the Potosí Department".
  • In the lead, you may wish to mention something that she did while she was a deputy, since otherwise it's quite short.
  • Are the names of her parents known?
  • Largo's father, a displaced mineworker [es], found work as a mason and later again as a miner. If the displacement is in reference to a specific event, you may want to explain it. Based on the links, my assumption is that the displacement had something to do with the 1985 closure of Bolivia's state-owned mines by Víctor Paz Estenssoro (the Paz family again, because of course). Though I was previously under the impression that the displacement alluded to was what caused her parents to move from Pati Pati to Potosí, that can't be right since she was born in 1974 and the mine closures happened in 1985.
    • The term relocalizado  which I and some sources translate as displaced  is a euphemism for mineworkers who "relocated" as a result of the closure of state mines in 1985. Largo refers to her father as a "relocalizado minero" but I didn't pick up that the dates don't really add up. Probably, she means that her parents already migrated for work and that the father later lost his mining job. That's a lot to explain  and interpret from the source  so I'm opting to omit the mention of it. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 22:56, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • In Gonzales Salas (p. 274), she says she had five siblings, so you may wish to mention that.
  • She studied at Tomás Frías University, graduating with a degree in economics. Is it known when she received this degree?
    • It seems she graduated in 2002. No source states so explicitly, but she mentions she held the student delegate rule during her "final term, before leaving university". I think this is enough to justify the claim. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 22:56, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • That role initiated her ties to the Movement Toward Socialism (MAS), which drew its core support from the peasant movement. You may want to specify that the MAS is a political party since the last two organizations were a social enterprise and a trade union, and a reader unfamiliar with Bolivian politics might be unaware of that. Something like "a political party which drew its core support...".
  • Vargas Luna and Villavicencio Arancibia (p. 89) say that she has a daughter, and she states so in Gonzales Salas (p. 275). I think that merits inclusion, possibly in the early life section.
  • In 2009, the party included her on its slate of candidates to represent Potosí Department in the Chamber of Deputies. Again, I think that should be "the Potosí Department".
  • In 2010, following mass protests, the Evo Morales administration pledged several public works projects to improve conditions in the region. I assume not, but is there a link for the protests? Also, perhaps this is too much detail, but you might want to say that Morales was the leader of the MAS, since that might not be obvious to a reader unfamiliar with Bolivian politics.
  • In Gonzales Salas (p. 275), she mentions wanting to legislate on children with Down syndrome. This is likely too obscure to determine, but did she end up writing and/or passing any legislation on that?
  • In Gonzales Salas (p. 276) and Vargas Luna and Villavicencio Arancibia (p. 89), there is talk of her being aware of the gender imbalance in various matters. As with the previous point, I'm wondering if she pushed any laws regarding women's rights.
  • She was not nominated for reelection. I imagine that the answer is no, but is it known why?
    • The MAS rarely nominated its legislators for reelection; it's usually when they were re-nominated that sources give an explanation as to why. Romero does explain this particularity of the party, if you think it worth including. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 22:56, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • The last information on this article is from more than a decade ago. Is anything known about what she has been up to, if anything, since the end of her term?
    • Kind of in line with the previous comment. The MAS had little interest in developing long political careers for its lawmakers, and since most were not public figures beforehand, they mostly return to relative obscurity. I could not find anything on Largo after her term in parliament. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 22:56, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Overall

[edit]

@Krisgabwoosh: This was a solid article. Pretty short, but given the obscurity of the subject, that's to be expected. I'm pleased to see quality articles on Latin American women being produced. After my comments have been addressed, I should be able to pass this. ThaddeusOrlando55 (talk) 21:21, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    c. (OR):
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail: