Jump to content

Talk:Farnsworth House

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by HurricaneZeta in topic Did you know nomination
Good articleFarnsworth House has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 20, 2026Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 7, 2026.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the original occupant of the Farnsworth House likened her experience there to that of a caged animal?

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gonzalesl18.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Farnsworth House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Farnsworth House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Farnsworth House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Farnsworth House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:00, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Farnsworth House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Editing section under Integration with nature

[edit]

Hello, I started editing and rewriting the section under integration with nature. I recently deleted the quote that encouraged an opinion. I also got rid of any writing that held the Wikipedia editor's personal feelings. I would love any feedback on the changes I have made. --Gonzalesl18 (talk) 18:24, 2 May 2018 (UTC)  Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonzalesl18 (talkcontribs) 14:46, 2 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Farnsworth House/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 01:08, 10 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Pencilsforall (talk · contribs) 01:10, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply


I'll take on this review. Seems like a fun page. It will probably take me more than a week given the length and number of sources. I'm pretty new to reviewing, so of course other comments are welcomed. I'm starting with references and sources and I'll post updates as I have them.

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Hi there! Fun article to review! Very minor ce issues were already addressed in the time I've been reviewing. Source checks were all good and enjoyable to read. Thanks for your work on this good article :) Pencilsforall (talk) 01:53, 20 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Source checks:

  • As noted on the talk page, the page numbers from Beam don't match the e-book version, but I was able to verify all neccessary content.
  • Sources were checked based on this version
Citation NumberVerified
5
6
10
11
20
32
33
34
34
37
37
38
39
39
43
44
46
51
53
53
55
55
62
62
69
69
70
71
78
87
93
103
105
105
109
116
135
145
157
163
168
169
176
197
207
213
224
224
235
249
249
250
258
263
266
266
318
326
345
351
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Beam 2020

[edit]

I've removed the dead link to this book. On further thought, it seems the original URL may have been an accidental violation of WP:COPYLINK. However, the book can still be viewed elsewhere (offline); the link to that book was merely for convenience. Epicgenius (talk) 17:01, 2 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I was able to find a copy of the ebook from a library for review (ISBN: 9780399592720), but it looks like the pagination is off from the version used in the references. For example the total number of pages in the ebook is 230 and some of the references are after. The quote "When one looks at Nature through the glass walls..." appears on page 105 in the ebook but it's referenced as on page 90. I can't quite figure out the pattern because it isn't a simple shift. Pencilsforall (talk) 23:28, 2 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
That's strange, but it also happens with ebooks sometimes. I was using the print version of the book, which can also be accessed here. Although the Internet Archive page says that access is restricted to patrons with print disabilities, it should be relatively easy to register an Internet Archive account and request print-disabled access. Epicgenius (talk) 00:28, 3 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by HurricaneZeta (talk) 23:16, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Farnsworth House
Farnsworth House
Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 773 past nominations.

Epicgenius (talk) 16:39, 20 January 2026 (UTC).Reply

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Epicgenius: So sad that we can only use one hook because all of these are extremely interesting and funny. Article was upgraded to GA recently and QPQ is met. I moved one image because it messed with the History section heading. Jon698 (talk) 07:14, 24 January 2026 (UTC)Reply