Talk:Enemies of Promise
Add topicLatest comment: 1 month ago by Llajwa in topic Too long! and no reception history
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
patch
[edit]There was clearly a word missing in the penultimate para of "Part 3":
...after a brief to St Wulfrics.
I have inserted the word "visit" as the most likely candidate, but if someone has access to the original text, please confirm.--Technopat (talk) 18:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Correct. Regards Motmit (talk) 18:24, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Too long! and no reception history
[edit]This article is much too detailed for an important but relatively obscure book from its period. Its chapter by chapter exposition verges on original research. I would feel a little bit bad to prune as much as should be pruned given the labor that a besotted editor put into it.
After all the detailed paraphrase of the book, it lacks any discussion of its reception and influence. Llajwa (talk) 16:02, 17 September 2026 (UTC)