This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
... that a 28-year-old policy analyst(pictured) was described as the "mastermind" of a plan to undermine Donald Trump's pro–in vitro fertilization agenda?
Source: "She’s 28, Loves God and Her Family, and Might Be the Reason You Can’t Have Kids... Waters pitched Heritage that she would cover emerging fertility tech as an analyst... As a kind of backroom wheeler-dealer and political strategist, she is the mastermind behind Florida’s recent ban on international surrogacy, the Texas GOP’s souring on IVF, and the squashing of Trump’s “fertilization president” initiatives." Emi Nietfeld, Wired magazine
ALT1: ... that in a 2026 book, Emma Waters(pictured) argues that women should pursue a middle path between tradwife and girlboss archetypes? Source: "'It is a mistake to treat the tradwife as the antidote to the girl boss,' Waters writes. 'The temptation to curate a life rather than live it is strong.' Her proposal is something of a middle path: women should recognize that there are seasons of life with different demands, and see their roles as wives and mothers not as a retreat from work but as a chance to build a foundation." Emma Green, The New Yorker
Overall: I spotchecked the refs 7, 10, and 13 of Special:Permalink/1382916987: YYY. Earwig gives "Violation unlikely, 31%" which is just cos of the quotes. My preference would be for the first hook, but happy to defer to others. Btw is to promote traditional family life and mores. a typo? Apologies in advance as I haven't much experience with image copyright, but it was uploaded as "own work" with the only description being "Nina Power", it also appears to be a still from a video? It implies the copyright is held by Nina Power (who's obv not the uploader), are stills of a video not copyrighted? (would be good to identify the origin) Otherwise this is good to go Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 00:37, 31 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Kowal2701, See Mores; it refers to social customs. As for the image, it appears to be a close-up shot at an event at which Emma Waters and Nina Power both spoke. (See here for a shot taken farther out.) The photographer takes lots of pictures from events in Budapest. Probably the photographer got the wrong name on the photo while uploading, or perhaps cropped a different image. Based on the existence of a separate photo I have no doubt this is a valid "own work" claim, and it does not look like a video still to me. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:57, 31 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
I spotchecked the refs 7, 10, and 13 of Special:Permalink/1382916987: 
Approved Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 11:41, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
