Talk:East York
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the East York article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on East York. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101027105942/http://estohouse.com/2009/contact to http://estohouse.com/2009/contact/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:06, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Government section
[edit]User:Abebenjoe recently updated the government section. However, the length and detail is excessive. Abebenjoe, would you be able to trim this section to the following: "Governing body...administrative bodies, political representation", per WP:CCSG? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:08, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- I'll give it a shot. Mostly boundaries, as those are explained in the electoral district articles for each riding or ward.– Abebenjoe (talk) 15:02, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Magnolia677, the edits that you made now make it a list and isn't prose. It is supposed to be prose not a list according to MOS:TIMELINE. I'll revert it tomorrow if I don't hear back from you.– Abebenjoe (talk) 22:33, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- That guideline has nothing to do with a section on government. Please read it again and do not revert. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:41, 16 December 2025 (UTC)


