This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Military history. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I wouldn't ordinarily suggest removing an article merely because of length, or lack of it -- but this is ridiculous. A single sentence? And it's unlikely in the extreme that anything further ever could be learned about this guy. All that could be said about him is already stated in the article on the battle itself. I urge this page be deleted. --Michael K SmithTalk22:19, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Nope, this article deserves to stay. First off, he was a noble - which is already far more significant than the thousands (tens of thousands?) of municipal politicians that we have articles on. He is made more famous by his deed of killing a consul, and i did hear of a couple of Renaissance plays that speculate on his later life. So there you have it - quite enough significance, and why go around deleting stuff? We have articles on far more silly things that are voraciously defended because they are modern. HalfdanRagnarsson (talk) 13:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
