Talk:Do Animals Have Rights?

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Do Animals Have Rights? article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Philosophy: Ethics Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

Animal rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Problems addressed

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The problems with this article is not that it doesn't have enough coverage. To the contrary it has too much coverage, but less reception coverage so there's an empty section for it for now.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 20:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Review

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Benjamin Hale's review is online in full which means we can expand the article, I will attempt this later today Psychologist Guy (talk) 16:14, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply