Talk:Desert Sunlight Solar Farm

In the shade

How much area will this project put into permanent shadow? TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 03:53, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

lack of objectivity

There's a real problem with lack of objectivity in the final paragraph. It should be removed or edited since the idea that disturbing/destroying several thousand acres of pristine desert habitat [in order to build a utility-scale solar plant] will somehow save that same habitat in the long wrong is fallacious at best. Pmbooks (talk) 21:08, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20120308003819/http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2011/09/doe-closes-on-three-major-solar-projects?cmpid=SolarNL-Tuesday-October4-2011. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 07:07, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20121122120134/http://www.kcet.org/news/rewire/government/solar-peis/parks-group-calls-for-solar-limits.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:00, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Dead link

The external link (at the foot of the infobox) to the First Solar website is dead. Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 22:22, 1 October 2025 (UTC)