This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the David Hilberman article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Cleveland, the scope of which includes Cleveland and the Greater Cleveland Area. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.ClevelandWikipedia:WikiProject ClevelandTemplate:WikiProject ClevelandCleveland
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
The following Wikipedia contributormay be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I am not sure who restored the Stub and replaced a biography I had written with some care and good input from "H:dryad". That process could have been ongoing, but the editor seemed more or less satisified with the tone -- not perfectly so. In any case the Stub remains inaccurate, especially with regard to simple things like his education, and incomplete. MarkHilberman (talk) 13:23, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Reading this article the other day on my phone, I noticed something in the article that bugged me. Obviously, this article reads somewhat like a biography, but in my opinion, that feels like a detriment than a virtue, particularly concerning the mentions of Walt Disney. I'm neither approving nor disavowing his actions, but the article becomes unnecessarily opinionated and biased when talking about the strike and the HUAC hearings. Granted other articles on this site mention these sorts of things, but they're either given proper sources or explicitly stated as being the opinions of experts, such as the articles on Walt Disney and the Hollywood blacklist. Neither of these things are present here, with weasel words often taking the place of objectivity, making the article feel more like an opinion piece disguised as a biography rather than a truly encyclopedic article like what is generally preferred here. MadManAmeica (talk) 19:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
On a similar note, Walt Disney testified to HUAC that Hilberman arrived at the company in 1938, after Snow White came out. Seeing as Hilberman isn't credited in the actual movie, why is there a section saying Hilberman worked on it? Dcgh96 (talk) 05:13, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
