Jump to content

Talk:Coorparoo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 days ago by Fortek67 in topic Requested move 13 September 2026

Untitled

[edit]

I was having a look at the page, and it seems that the listed location for the picture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Brisbane_CBD_from_Chatsworth_Road_at_Cavendish_Road,_2009.JPG is actually listed at the wrong location. It's actually taken from Upper Cornwall Street off of Chatsworth Road.

Anyone else able to confirm? Da chucky (talk) 16:44, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coorparoo, Queensland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

St Anne's Anglican Church

[edit]

Although I have a citation to a list compiled by the diocese, I am bothered by both the vagueness of the church's listing and the lack of any other evidence of this church. My 1975 Street directory of Brisbane marks churches on the maps and has an index of churches and there is no St Anne's in Coorparoo or any other suburb in the vicinity of Cavendish Road. If anyone knows anything more about it, please add it. Kerry (talk) 05:50, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 13 September 2026

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Move all articles listed (per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC) except Taringa, Queensland per discussion. (closed by non-admin page mover) Fortek67 (talk) 12:48, 20 September 2026 (UTC)Reply


– No disambiguation required per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. all of these when put in without ",Queensland" simply redirect into itself with it. Kyethepie21 (talk) 07:32, 13 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

  • While I am generally tentatively supportive of making titles more concise, I think these are likely more immediately recognizable as they are. Furthermore, I am not convinced that all of these would, upon close inspection, prove to be the primary topics of their titles. For example, given Taringa! and Taringa (gastropod), I suspect that Taringa should be disambiguated. Similarly, Manchester Lake sounds like something referring to any of the dozens of entries on the List of lakes of England that are indicated as being in Manchester. Most of these names probably don't have such an infirmity, but I feel like there should be at least a case-by-case quick look to confirm. BD2412 T 03:00, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
    I don't entirely disagree with your points, but these redirects into themselves have existed since 2005 in the case of Taringa, of course, you always want to improve the website, but its been fine for 21 years, another disambiguation probably more than suffices. And other than that one example, I dont see how any of these could have any issue, these have already existed as redirects into themselves for 20 odd years. Most of them are of Jagera or Turrbal origin. This really isnt a case by case basis, its updating neglected pages from 20 years ago to be compliant with modern standards. Kyethepie21 (talk) 06:51, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Weak oppose but without prejudice if move back is needed. I think the move is probably compliant with current standards but I find the ", Queensland" versions clearer and more aesthetically pleasing.
    i.e. I probably oppose the policy that supports this move, but agree that this move is compliant with that policy. Thought stapler (talk) 21:15, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • Rename all without prejudice to any individual follow-up RMs The suffix is not needed for these. If there are a few individual articles that might need disambiguation that's best tackled afterwards once the general pattern has been set. Timrollpickering (talk) 15:07, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 18:07, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • Support in principle per nom, I have taken the liberty of converting Taringa to a disambiguation page as noted above, the Brisbane suburb is not the primary topic. Suggest the nominator strike it from the list. Parerlahjea (talk) 23:41, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Happy for that to be the case, unless im missing something striking the text wont work (seemingly it wont allow any altering to it), but unless theres dissent I guess I'd just ask whoever the admin who reads this to NOT move Taringa, Queensland. Kyethepie21 (talk) 12:35, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom. FromCzech (talk) 06:05, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.