Talk:Claranet

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 September 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests: Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess: Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit: Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox: Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain: Portal:Companies
Stubs: Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other:
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

References

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Ideally the references in the article should not be press releases from the company itself, but a third party commentary. MRSC • Talk 09:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Added some external references. Tripper (talk) 13:25, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

wwe

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

the wwe is a good hing!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.140.209.215 (talk) 11:41, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Point of View

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This Claranet article uses a lot of 1st party (same company) sources related to things they're doing, and uses language like "revolutionising the IT market in Portugal" without explaining it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webash (talk • contribs) 17:35, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply