This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article was created or improved during the Parliamentarians edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in December 2019. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Look, lots of politicians have their picture taken with other politicians. This is normal. It does not mean that they support of even like the people they meet with. Trudeau has had his picture taken with Putin. Does that make him a Putin supporter? Trump has had his picture taken with the dictator of North Korea. Does that make him a communist? Doug Ford has had his picture taken with Trudeau. Does that make them besties? This is clearly not of Encyclopedic value whatsoever. This German politician has surely had her picture taken with thousands of people. Should we list them all? What sheer and utter nonsense is this? 208.98.222.112 (talk) 23:27, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps we could come to some kind of middle ground by reducing that paragraph to a single sentence? I'm unsure about the notability of this "controversy" and whether it truly exists or not, googling "Chrstine Anderson Controversy" only has one or two sources about this- As well as this, the event is still very very recent; if it becomes more significant and notable as time goes on, it makes sense to include it, but at the moment I don't really think it does deserve the entire paragraph.tla02:46, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article appears to be recently edited to only project some Canadian based SJW agenda. There is
minimal pertinent and factual information, and maximal gaslighting. Altogether, it seriously degrades Wiki credibility.
