This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
There is too much weight being placed on certain subjects in this article. Basically Charlie Brooks is famous for being Janine Butcher - but she is not Janine Butcher, she is Charlie Brooks and most of the infro relating to Janine can easily be written about in the article about Janine Butcher. The name confusion is a non event (just tabloid filler) and has a section to itself. One line would be pushing it. The non-free image was just an abuse of fair-use, the editor who added it should know better, I have removed it.Rainthe 116:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
I agree the section about another person with the same name should go - and there's probably too much information about Janine rather than Brooks. It could do with being tagged {{Overly detailed}} - also needs a good copyedit as some sentences don't make much sense. –anemoneprojectors– 20:24, 18 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I cannot help but notice that there is too much weight being placed on the controversies surrounding Brooks' new play and no content on Brooks' role. Am of the view that that section is in need of a major rewrite to address this imbalance. Am also of the opinion that current editing of this section is overspill of problems from Alex Oates Is it too soon for this section to be in existence? Chricon79 (talk) 02:58, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
