This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taylor Swift on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
A fact from Cancelled! appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 November2025(check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that The London Standard described the lyrics in a Taylor Swift song as "a car crash of outdated millennial cringe"?
Latest comment: 11 months ago14 comments7 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move reviewafter discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Comment: Should this be closed early? It is pretty obvious that "Cancelled!" is the preferred title, and if so, I'll G6 the current redirect. HwyNerdMike (tokk) 00:54, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
I think it's way too early to do that. The RM just started, and the current number of !votes would probably not be enough for this to be considered a WP:SNOW close. We should let it run for a little longer. Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk|contribs) 00:57, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Latest comment: 10 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Regarding the reliability of sources, there are a lot of gossip/entertainment magazine sources in this article. But frankly I think that is acceptable given the subject. Hooke is definitely a fun sentence. David Palmer//cloventt(talk)21:45, 31 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
![WikiProject icon](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WikiProject_Songs_7"_record_on_sheet_music.png){kind=small}
Regarding the reliability of sources, there are a lot of gossip/entertainment magazine sources in this article. But frankly I think that is acceptable given the subject. Hooke is definitely a fun sentence. David Palmer//cloventt (talk) 21:45, 31 October 2025 (UTC)