This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Stanford University, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Stanford University on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Stanford UniversityWikipedia:WikiProject Stanford UniversityTemplate:WikiProject Stanford UniversityStanford University
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy
Latest comment: 15 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
excessively sourced to primary references, using insider slang, not encyclopedic language ("paper") and soemwhat hyped and outdated. Wuerzele (talk) 23:35, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Not sure if those are considered primary sources. Hate to say it but "papers" are anything but primary and are well accepted sources for wikipedia articles. Chrisvanlang (talk) 00:18, 9 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
