Talk:Burton Lane
Add topic| Burton Lane has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 13, 2026. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payola
[edit]Lane didn't try to combat "music piracy" as understood today so much as he fought payola (cf Alan Freed) and corruption. I'd like to add a section about it. Any thoughts? Matuko (talk) 18:25, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- +1 Dave Schweisguth (talk) 18:52, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Matuko I would be happy if you either added that section or provided sources that could support it. Dave Schweisguth (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
- I added a bit. https://archive.org/details/penguinencyclope0000unse/page/982/mode/2up suggests that there might be more interesting detail out there (Payola only mentions Lane accusing publishers of bribing DJs, while the Penguin article mentions a conflict of interest in publishers owning stations) but I haven't found other solid sources. Dave Schweisguth (talk) 00:45, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
GA review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Burton Lane/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Dave Schweisguth (talk · contribs) 00:52, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 00:06, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
I'll take this review because of your good review/nominations ratio. Keep it up! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:06, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29, thanks for reviewing. I'm just getting to it. Dave Schweisguth (talk) 18:12, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- General comments
- The lead needs to be longer to properly summarise the article. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section for guidance.
- Prose is good quality, article is broad, focused, neutral, and stable, with relevant images with valid licenses/rationales and suitable captions.
- References seem generally reliable. Consider adding archive-urls to the non-book sources.
- I will conduct a source spotcheck shortly. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:13, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
- Source spotcheck
This table lists 13 random passages from throughout the article (9.9% of 131 total passages). These passages contain 13 inline citations (9.4% of 139 in the article). Generated with the Veracity user script. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:14, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29 I fixed the Bloom 1996 (and 1995) links and the Ewen and Winer page numbers. What is "needs a timestamp"? Dave Schweisguth (talk) 19:19, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Dave Schweisguth, like how you provide page numbers for books, it's best to provide a timestamp telling the reader when in a video/audio recording something occurred. So, if the relevant part you're citing occurred five minutes and twelve seconds into this this thirteen-minute audio recording, you'd use the parameter "|at=5:12" (instead of "|p=", which is for pages). Helpful? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:58, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29 Clear, thanks. Will do. Dave Schweisguth (talk) 21:08, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Dave Schweisguth, like how you provide page numbers for books, it's best to provide a timestamp telling the reader when in a video/audio recording something occurred. So, if the relevant part you're citing occurred five minutes and twelve seconds into this this thirteen-minute audio recording, you'd use the parameter "|at=5:12" (instead of "|p=", which is for pages). Helpful? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:58, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- Done with all citation issues (though I haven't yet done anything with archive links). Dave Schweisguth (talk) 00:36, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
| Reference # | Letter | Source | Archive | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and two songs used in the revue Three's a Crowd: "Forget All Your Books" and "Out in the Open Air." | |||||
| 11 | a | Bloom 1996, p. 1122. | You may wish to adjust the link, which takes you to the A—S book. | ||
| Lane's early days on Tin Pan Alley and Broadway ended when his employer, Irving Berlin Inc., sent him and Adamson to Hollywood for six weeks, and Lane remained there for 21 years. | |||||
| 7 | d | Ewen 1987, p. 253. | Should be p. 254 | ||
| from which "Too Late Now" was nominated for a Best Song Academy Award. | |||||
| 27 | a | oscars.org | |||
| it was nominated for a Tony Award for Best Original Score, | |||||
| 36 | a | ibdb.com | |||
| Carmelina's libretto was also criticized, and it closed quickly, | |||||
| 35 | b | Ewen 1987, p. 256. | |||
| Lane did finally collaborate with Dorothy Fields on the made-for-television musical Junior Miss, which aired on CBS on December 20, 1957. | |||||
| 50 | b | Winer 1997, pp. 185–186. | No mention of Junior Miss on the relevant pages. | ||
| But Lane said repeatedly that, though he never actually worked or studied with him, | |||||
| 9 | c | kpfa.org | Needs a timestamp. | ||
| Yip Harburg said that Lane was the composer who came closest to Gershwin's "effervescence". | |||||
| 21 | d | wnyc.org | Needs a timestamp. | ||
| We Bombed in New Haven (play, 1968). Contributed "Bomb, Bomb, Bombing Along", lyrics by the playwright, Joseph Heller. | |||||
| 70 | ibdb.com | ||||
| Dancing on a Dime (1940). Lyrics by Frank Loesser. | |||||
| 80 | Bloom 1995, pp. 204–205. | ||||
| Royal Wedding (1951). Lyrics by Alan Jay Lerner. | |||||
| 26 | c | Bloom 1995, p. 795. | |||
| "Moments Like This". Lyrics by Frank Loesser. From the 1938 film College Swing. | |||||
| 90 | Hischak 1999, p. 202. | ||||
| "On a Clear Day (You Can See Forever)" | |||||
| 38 | b | Hischak 1995, p. 261. | |||
Putting this on hold so the sourcing improvements and lead expansion can be resolved. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:14, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29 Done with citation issues (though I haven't done anything with archive links yet) and a more extensive lead section. I think you'll be able to proceed. Dave Schweisguth (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks Dave Schweisguth. Would it be possible for you to also provide the timestamp for this source? Other than that, I can't see any remaining issues. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:04, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Music good articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (musicians) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (musicians) articles
- Musicians work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class Musical Theatre articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
