Jump to content

Talk:Bossa nova

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by ~2026-38602-45 in topic Remove Billie Eilish/Laufey mentions
Former good articleBossa nova was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 29, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 19, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Absence of vocal vibrato

[edit]

Shouldn't we mention the almost universal absence of vocal vibrato in bossa nova singing, which seems to be one of this genre's hallmarks? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 23:29, 30 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Infobox picture

[edit]

Although it involves legends of the genre, I don't think it's a good choice for an infobox picture. Coming to the article without knowing any context, it looked to my uneducated eye like several avant-garde artists entertaining each other in a hotel room not with their music, but with their wit... it did not speak of 'music' to me at all, but of performance art... I would have guessed they were not musicians, but actors in between takes while filming a Fellini movie. Any generic picture of Rio would be better in my opinion, or one of these... these have the virtue of at least including a musical instrument. Marcus Markup (talk) 21:55, 31 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

20170823 Plastik zu Ehren Antônio Carlos Jobims
Antônio Carlos Jobim and lyricist Vinicius de Moraes

Remove Billie Eilish/Laufey mentions

[edit]

Shouldn't the final paragraph in the History section be removed? Neither of these musicians are really a part of the bossa nova tradition (so I'd argue they shouldn't be discussed at all). Also, the writing is not really correct. ~2026-38602-45 (talk) 08:08, 6 July 2026 (UTC)Reply