Talk:Blink Twice

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Romance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Cinema

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

August 25 to 31, 2024

Production companies: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer | Free Association | this is important | Bold Choices

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi HM2021,

You've undone my revision:

   => https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blink_Twice&diff=1240136943&oldid=1239654542

With the following justification:

   "This is actually not an error but these are the exact companies credited on the poster."

I don't think that something listed on a poster which nobody can see could be used as sufficient ground for reverting somebody's changes, don't you agree? Can you back up your claim that those are indeed companies involved in the production of that film, "this is important" and "Bold Choices"? The former doesn't even sound like a proper company name, more like a joke... And nothing like that is listed for the film on IMDb: => https://www.imdb.com/title/tt14858658/companycredits/?ref_=tt_dt_co..

Cheers, Szagory (talk) 19:15, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hmm, actually I've just taken a look at the listing on The Numbers (website):

=> https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Blink-Twice-(2024)#tab=summary

Production/Financing Companies: This Is Important, Free Association, Amazon MGM Studios, Bold Choices

Alright, the name is indeed there. Still, it doesn't sound like a proper company name, does it? 🤔

BTW, presumably "this" in that name as listed now in WP:Infobox should be capitalised, don't you think?

Cheerio,

Szagory (talk) 19:21, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

If it's credited on the poster, then it is official companies. Mike Allen 22:20, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviews are unbalanced

Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The film has 75% on Rotten Tomatoes, but the reviews cited in the article are ALL BAD. Someone needs to fix this. ~2026-18190-26 (talk) 18:44, 23 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Agree — even now, with positive reviews included, there are more words dedicated to extremely negative reviews than mixed or positive ones. It's clear that prior editors carried personal biases over into opinions or the work. The weights placed on the two sides still don't make sense to an unbiased observer relative to the general reception of the film.

I am looking further into whether we should possibly cut down on the description (summary, direct quotes, etc.) of highly negative reviews so the Critical Response section is accurate to the real-world critical response, not based around some random guy's anger toward this movie and its themes. Cash7789 (talk) 21:37, 11 June 2026 (UTC)Reply