Talk:Biology Direct

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Open (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen

Untitled

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Biology direct was known for its (at the time) unusual peer review practice -authors recruited the reports, and reviews were signed; as outlined in the present version of the WP article.

However, looking at their author info pages it appears Biology Direct returned to the traditional model, with anonymous reviewers selected by an editor? https://biologydirect.biomedcentral.com/about

--46.31.218.139 (talk) 17:31, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply