Jump to content

Talk:Bay of Bengal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Bis-Serjetà? in topic "Bayofbengal" listed at Redirects for discussion

Adding some important information about sea ports

[edit]

Dear editors, It will be more informative if we attach the list of all the sea ports located and active in the bay of Bengal. If we do this it will be more easy to know about this bay and subcontinent. So please, We should do it Mohammad Ali Rplsc (talk) 07:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Madras State?

[edit]

'it's now part of India's Madras State '!. Are we making up states now? 73.46.159.225 (talk) 00:12, 28 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Kalinga Sagar

[edit]

Here it is written, in the classical India the Bay of Bengal was called Kalinga Sagar. But the sources of this information are not trustworthy. Because Mr. Mohanty gave his own opinion and also Bay of Bengal does not include only Kalinga region of India. So how can we say that? Kushdeep12 (talk) 15:54, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

This is cited to an article in the The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies, a peer-reviewed journal. This is a top-tier source and attempts to remove it or tag it as unreliable are completely improper. MrOllie (talk) 16:11, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Already read the journal. This journal is just someone's opinion. He didn't mention it in which historical source it was written "Kalinga Sagar". The citation is not not trustworthy.And how did you know, it is a peer reviewed journal? Kushdeep12 (talk) 16:35, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

It clearly says so on the website of the journal as well as at the given jstor link. MrOllie (talk) 16:50, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Clearly says? It doesn't give any reference of historical books. It is just someone's research paper. Kushdeep12 (talk) 17:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

We do not require peer-reviewed sources to meet your personal standards, only those of the journal's editors and reviewers. MrOllie (talk) 17:27, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Then why are you replying? Did I ask you to reply? Or I can't write anything in talk page. Even I can give a valuable source. Kushdeep12 (talk) 17:32, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

The purpose of the talk page is to discuss. Why did you post here if you don't want people to reply? MrOllie (talk) 17:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

That's why I posted; Group Discussion.But someone wrote "we don't need your..." so I can also write please don't reply. Kushdeep12 (talk) 17:51, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Prayers to the sea on Paush Purnima

[edit]

​​​On 08:23, 29 May 2025 (UTC) an editor deleted the section on religious importance, saying: Not enough citation since 2022Reply

On 14:24, 23 June 2025 (UTC) another reverted back, saying: Does not justify complete removal, rv to original version A protest about his/her doing so is at WP:AE.

There are now citations for all statements except the last. I cannot find a citation for On Paush Purnima of every year the Shankaracharya himself comes out to offer prayers to the sea, and propose to delete this uncited (and not particularly relevant) statement unless someone can provide a citation that supports it. Another solution would be to reword it so that it can be supported.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:09, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Toddy1 Okay good that all other portions have citations. I have citations for the last statement too that I'll shortly attach it there. This completely justifies my reverting. The previous editor simply removed the whole passage (even when it had citations including the Deccan Herald) in it. Sadly it was prematurely escalated by another editor in WP:AE. Editking100 (talk) 20:40, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Toddy1 Hey, Toddy1. In the reference no 39 attached to the line above the last statement. If you look into the same source (in the first paragraph, last line has clear mention of the claim made here on the last line regd the Shankaracharya himself coming to pray. So we can attach it to the same source 39 above. Also the same claim is there on the historyofodisha.in even if you search the last sentence, you'll find the same wording. Hope that helps Editking100 (talk) 20:50, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. The citation to historyofodisha.in does support the statement, and I have replaced the citation needed tag with a citation to it.
The Deccan Herald said "On the evening of Pausha Poornima, a unique prayer rose from Swargadwar on Puri Beach." It did not support that Swargadwar did this every year, and it did not support that Swargadwar prayed to the sea.-- Toddy1 (talk) 21:42, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

"Bayofbengal" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Bayofbengal has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 19 § Alanturing until a consensus is reached. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 18:50, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply