Talk:Battle of Mosynopolis

Battle of Mosynopolis is currently a Warfare good article nominee. Nominated by A.Cython (talk) at 18:39, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review this article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor. When complete, this review will be closed by the reviewer. To view the review and add comments, click discuss review.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Mosynopolis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Bulgaria Low‑importance

	Bulgaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crusades: Crusades Military Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crusades, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Crusades on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CrusadesWikipedia:WikiProject CrusadesTemplate:WikiProject CrusadesCrusades
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by The Crusades Military task force.

Middle Ages: Crusades Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Crusades task force.

Military history: Balkan / European / Medieval / Crusades

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Military history. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500 – present)
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Crusades task force

GA review

Latest comment: 4 days ago6 comments3 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Mosynopolis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: A.Cython (talk · contribs) 18:39, 23 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Reverosie (talk · contribs) 13:54, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I'll be your GA reviewer. You're probably very confused, so let me explain briefly.

I have a lot of background on this topic (I even created one of its relevant wikiprojects, WP:CRUSADES), so this review will be much easier. Instead of asking you about textual changes and whatnot, I can do it myself since I generally know what to do. I can also do the spot check much more easily since I'm familiar with a lot of the sources myself. To be clear, however, I will be prioritizing the GA review we already have open together before turning all of my attention to this one. I am not willing to sacrifice the quality of either reviews, and I am opening both of them up because I am already very familiar with this article's topic. ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 13:54, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Happy to make changes under the guidance of an expert. I am not an expert and this is one of my poor efforts made last November as part of a competition in the WPMH project. Given the lack of sources (at least to my capabilities) I feel it was good enough for GAN. Please note that this article along with other ones regarding Bulagria in this era were targets of vandalism (about flags, changing numbers and outcomes at the infobox) from editors who were eventually banned. I thought to mention this in advance. A.Cython (talk) 15:05, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Reverosie: Reminder ping about this review. Z1720 (talk) 04:01, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

- @Reverosie: courtesy ping; I hope things are better now. A.Cython (talk) 01:39, 2 October 2026 (UTC)Reply