Talk:Barracuda Networks
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Barracuda Networks article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Request edit on 06 June 2015
[edit]Add https://barracudalabs.com/
| This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes may be promotional in tone. |
(The above requested edit was made by clicking on a link in an automatically added notice.)
Diverse
[edit]1. What is a "whitlist"? 2. What are "Barracuda Blog Lists"? 3. The behaviour of this company is dubious at least, wildly blocking IPs for unexplained reasons. Especially in Europe where the majority of users has dynamic IPs which are given to them by European providers of a good reputation are blocked already at the very first contact. Research shows even stranger behavior which might be illegal in different Non-U.S. countries under their own jurisdictions.
--- What are you asking/suggesting? When my IP was blocked they fixed it right away and told me why it was blocked. Nothing dubious or illegal about it. You should add your research to the controversies section.
Reorganizing
[edit]Hi All. My name is Anne and I work for Barracuda Networks. In compliance with WP:COI, I was hoping to get some feedback from an impartial editor on some minor changes and reorganizing of the page. Here are my suggestions:
- The current page has a lot of one-sentence paragraphs. Can I remove some of the line breaks to consolidate paragraphs as a non-controversial COI Edit?
- The current page has a separate "Acquisitions" section. I was thinking this should be a sub-section under History.
- The Lead is just one sentence and I think needs expansion. I'll work on a draft to propose.
- In the Leadership sub-section, I think we should delete the sentence starting with "Jenkins worked at EMC" that starts giving the exec's resume and remove the line about an SVP (to focus only on CEOs) and merge the rest (the CEO appointments) into their chronological spot in the history section.
- The current page has tags at the top for poor sourcing, etc. Do folks think those have been addressed at this point?
Let me know if all or some of these are ok. AnneKasperCampbell (talk) 17:29, 10 September 2026 (UTC)
- C-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- C-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- Low-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- C-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- C-Class Computer networking articles
- Low-importance Computer networking articles
- C-Class Computer networking articles of Low-importance
- All Computer networking articles
- C-Class Computer security articles
- Low-importance Computer security articles
- C-Class Computer security articles of Low-importance
- All Computer security articles
- All Computing articles
- Declined requested edits


