Jump to content

Talk:Barbie Riding Club

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Vestrian24Bio in topic GA review
Good articleBarbie Riding Club has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 10, 2026Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 2, 2026.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a 1998 horseback-riding simulator "raised a generation of horse girls"?

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Zzz plant (talk) 04:43, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

  • Source: Javaid, Maham; Judkis, Maura; Hesse, Monica; Andrews-Dyer, Helena; Peise r, Jaclyn; Koncius, Jura; Branigin, Anne; Hassan, Jennifer; McCormack, Olivia; Caren, Allie; Kingsberry, Janay; Chery, Samantha (July 15, 2023). "16 ways we think about Barbie". The Washington Post – via EBSCOhost. In titles such as the 'Secret Agent Barbie' series and 1998's 'Barbie Riding Club,' which raised a generation of horse girls, Barbie's computer games helped prove that girls can be gamers - and whatever else they want to be.
5x expanded by Chao Garden (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 11 past nominations.

— Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 03:36, 19 July 2026 (UTC).Reply

Article has been 5x expanded since 12 July. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hook is interesting and sourced. QPQ is done. Looks ready to hit the trail! Thriley (talk) 16:09, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Barbie Riding Club/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Chao Garden (talk · contribs) 06:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Vestrian24Bio (talk · contribs) 04:17, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey @Vestrian24Bio, just checking in. Do you have any questions about the article? — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 05:47, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Had some network problems but back now, will finish the review tomorrow. Vestrian24Bio 16:07, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello @Vestrian24Bio, I've responded to your feedback below. — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 15:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Comments

[edit]
Barbie Riding Club (as of this rev)

That's all I got. Vestrian24Bio 09:23, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you @Vestrian24Bio. I just fixed the duplicate link.
As for All Game Guide, they are considered "marginally reliable" per WP:ALLMUSIC (which includes All Game, operated by Rhythm One): "There is consensus that RhythmOne websites are usable for entertainment reviews with in-text attribution." And the Video Game project provides this analysis of All Game: "There is a consensus that AllGame is usable for reviews, with attribution. However, some editors question the accuracy of its raw database for facts such as genre and credits, and recommend more reliable sources when available." I've used these All Games pages in two ways: to provide secondary support for some non-controversial information about the game and a different Barbie video game title, and to provide review information. The All Games pages I used are not raw database listings; each page has a clear author. What do you think about this usage? — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 14:42, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I just updated the article replace the Detective Barbie AllGames link with a link to the credits page of that game's manual.
So now the only AllGames citations are for 2 supporting facts about gameplay & then several citations for specific AllGames review information. — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 19:13, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Source spot-check

[edit]
Reference #LetterSourceArchiveStatusNotes
Gameplay
Rescue missions are assigned using the in-game interactive pager. Christie and Teresa will call whenever they need help with an issue while out on the trail.
2gservice.mattel.comweb.archive.org Good
3cnewspapers.comweb.archive.org Good
Development and release
At Mattel, Cynthia Woll was the executive producer, and novelist Matt Costello wrote the story for the game.
2oservice.mattel.comweb.archive.org Good
7books.google.com Good
The game was showcased by Mattel Media at E3 1998
13newspapers.com Good
Reception
The manufacturer of the PCs, Patriot Computers, had to delay shipments of the Barbie PC bundles during the 1999 holiday season due to defective power supplies. Ultimately, the manufacturer failed to deliver 3,100 Barbie and Hot Wheels PCs and went bankrupt the following year.
25cbc.caweb.archive.org Good
26theverge.comweb.archive.org Good
22barticles.latimes.comweb.archive.org Good
No text found: citation may be in an infobox or table
3fnewspapers.comweb.archive.org Good
4callgame.comweb.archive.org Good
16bBuckleitner, Warren; Orr, Ann; Wolock, Ellen (2002). Complete Sourcebook on Children's Interactive …archive.org Good
27agamespot.co.ukweb.archive.org Good
28asuperkids.comweb.archive.org Good
@Chao Garden: all good in spot-check. Vestrian24Bio 09:23, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Final review

[edit]
  • EARWIG shows 4.8% - violation unlikely. Vestrian24Bio 09:23, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • According to link-dispenser (permalink),
    • 7 refs need archive URLs.
    • 3 potentially spammy refs.
    Vestrian24Bio 09:23, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Thank you @Vestrian24Bio. I think that tool you are using is not very good at assessing Wikipedia Library's EBSCO Host links, because all 3 "potentially spammy" links are from paywalled sources or, in one case, a print source that likely doesn't exist online in another form:
    1. "In Her PC Games, Barbie Taught '90s Kids They Could Do It All" is a paywalled Daily Beast article (see: WP:DAILYBEAST, "no consensus") that we have access to via the Wikipedia Library
    2. "16 ways we think about Barbie" is a paywalled Washington Post article (reliable source: WP:WAPO)
    3. "'Legacy-free' development cuts costs, boosts features" is for an article from a print magazine This Week In Consumer Electronics (aka "Twice" magazine) that possibly never even existed online.
    For the pages without archive links:
    1. "In Her PC Games, Barbie Taught '90s Kids They Could Do It All" article requires Wikipedia Library / EBSCO host login and, as such, cannot be archived. The link-dispenser tool shows this as well with the tag "HTTP status code 302" (which references the login redirect)
    2. Complete Sourcebook on Children's Interactive Media is already hosted on Archive.org & is blocked by the Wayback Machine, which is why the link-dispensor tool marks it as "Requests blocked by site owner"
    3. "16 Ways We Think About Barbie" is another Wikipedia Library / EBSCO host login that link-dispenser marks as "HTTP status code 302".
    4. Game Design: From Blue Sky to Green Light is hosted on Google Books & you can't effectively archive those. It will just turn up blank.
    5. "'Legacy-free' development cuts costs, boosts features" is another Wikipedia Library / EBSCO host login that link-dispenser marks as "HTTP status code 302".
    6. The Chicago Tribune article is from Newspapers.com. Recently, that site has completely blocked archive scrapers like Wayback Machine. link-dispenser marks as "Requests blocked by site owner" & if you try to archive it with the Wayback Machine / Archive.org, you get an error saying that it's forbidden.
    7. El Paso Times article is also from Newspapers.com & returns "Requests blocked by site owner".
    • NOTE about Newspapers.com -- there is an existing Houston Chronicle article hosted on Newspapers.com that has an archive link. I suppose someone archived it before archiving was blocked. This is my best guess, because archiving those links is not possible anymore, from what I see & from what link-dispenser shows with "Requests blocked" labels.
    For the sites above that cannot be archived, I have gone through and added {{cbignore}} (see: Template:Cbignore) to these links. I also removed archive links for Austin Biz Journal (because they have retroactively blocked Wayback Machine archiving, so the archive link just goes to a blank error page). Other than this cbignore template, I'm not sure how else to indicate that these links, unfortunately, can't be archived like normal links.
    All that being said: what do you think about this?— Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 14:31, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Yeah I archived the Houston Chronicle clipping. I have been using Newspapers.com since 2021 and have been archiving my clippings until that block. Timur9008 (talk) 14:46, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
    I should note the Austin Business Journal article worked fine last year (it was archived in 2004 not 2019, I've put in may Sanbox just in case). Wayback Machine machine links either work or they don't and many links disappear and reappear. Timur9008 (talk) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Yeah unfortunately I think that Biz Journal recently updated their robots.txt file to exclude the Wayback Machine's crawlers. And then, based on the Wayback Machine's exclusion policy, any old archives they had were hidden. — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 15:58, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • Media usage:
    All files have proper copyright tags, captions and alt texts. Vestrian24Bio 09:23, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

All else good, passing for GA. Vestrian24Bio 15:57, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.