Talk:BYD Company
Add topic| BYD HES was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 23 September 2023 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the BYD Company article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives (index): 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:23, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
"Imitation" section deletion
[edit]I recently reverted an edit which removed section 6.1 "Imitation of competing models". The edit cited a lack of support of the section, and claimed that it was outdated. This was not the case, and I returned the section. However, if people honestly believe that there is something wrong with the section, that the criticisms and claims of copying are unfounded, then it should be discussed with honesty. I personally think that the best route would be to provide articles highlighting the innovations of newer vehicles, which would make the current text seem dated, but adding counterclaims would also work (though neither of these would justify deleting the current text). If someone finds a good article, I'll write the text, since showing all sides is important. StigmaOfTruth (talk) 01:09, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Intro 'backform'ing
[edit]I think it's actually a backronym, not backforming yeah? --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 23:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 17 June 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 10:12, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
BYD Company → BYD – and BYD should be moved BYD (disambiguation), as the other uses for "BYD" are either uncommon abbreviations (for example, there is no mention of BYD being an abbreviation for Bury Your Dead in its article), or code-related (NYSE and station code). Also, WikiNav data shows that most people are looking for BYD Company or its largest subsidiary BYD Auto. Andra Febrian (talk) 04:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 16:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose BYD Company and BYD Auto are both quite notable, and get thousands of daily pageviews . I don't see one as primary topic ahead of the other, though. 162 etc. (talk) 04:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- BYD Auto can be considered as a "sub-article" of BYD Company because it's its subsidiary. Samsung Electronics is probably the most popular Samsung subsidiary yet Samsung is not a disambiguation. It gets taken care of with a hatnote. Andra Febrian (talk) 05:56, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Conversely, Toyota leads to Toyota Motor Corporation, not Toyota Group. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. No primary topic. 162 etc. (talk) 07:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- BYD Auto can be considered as a "sub-article" of BYD Company because it's its subsidiary. Samsung Electronics is probably the most popular Samsung subsidiary yet Samsung is not a disambiguation. It gets taken care of with a hatnote. Andra Febrian (talk) 05:56, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Because Toyota Group is not a 'real' company, it is a 'group' of companies with limited notability - it doesn't even have its own website. Clearly not cut out to be WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.
- Other example would be Volvo and Volvo Cars, both are real companies, the latter has a relationship with the former, but one became primary topic due to its larger business operations and the other was its subsidiary. Both articles has thousands of daily pageviews, with Volvo Cars being more popular. Andra Febrian (talk) 08:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- WP:DPT asks us to consider two things only: Pageviews and long-term notability. Your nomination makes no case for either of these criteria. 162 etc. (talk) 15:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Other example would be Volvo and Volvo Cars, both are real companies, the latter has a relationship with the former, but one became primary topic due to its larger business operations and the other was its subsidiary. Both articles has thousands of daily pageviews, with Volvo Cars being more popular. Andra Febrian (talk) 08:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class China-related articles
- High-importance China-related articles
- B-Class China-related articles of High-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- B-Class company articles
- High-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- B-Class Automobile articles
- Top-importance Automobile articles
- B-Class energy articles
- Mid-importance energy articles
- B-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles