Talk:Ashford Castle

More refs!

There are whole sections of this article without any sources whatsoever. Some of it (IMO) doesn't even belong on this page like the stuff about the descendants of a former owner of the hotel. I removed some unreferenced and unrelated material about the abbey. Drow69 (talk) 09:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Ashford Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.irishtimes.com/business/sectors/commercial-property/ashford-castle-hotel-resort-sold-for-20m-1.1402546
• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/people/niall-rochford-manager-of-ashford-castle-cong-co-mayo-1.1419562

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:36, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ashford Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304023508/http://www.mayolibrary.ie/en/LocalStudies/IrishTouristAssociationSurvey/CongandTheNeale/AshfordCastle/PDFDocument,16110,en.pdf to http://www.mayolibrary.ie/en/LocalStudies/IrishTouristAssociationSurvey/CongandTheNeale/AshfordCastle/PDFDocument,16110,en.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

"2011 public right of way controversy"

As it stands, the "2011 public right of way controversy" section seems incomplete. And a bit of a stand-out loose end. It seems to have been added, as a form of NOTNEWS content, during the week of the protest. Unless there was some kind of conclusion or other coverage which establishes that this (short-lived?) right-of-way dispute has lasting independent relevance, I wonder if it should just be "moved" to sit in the "history" section. While I personally think that controversy/criticism sections sometimes have a place, as noted in the CSECTION essay, some stuff (including "controversies" that may not be especially prominent or having lasting historical/encyclopedic relevance) might be best just covered in the body. This seems like an example of that.... Guliolopez (talk) 15:29, 3 July 2026 (UTC)