Talk:Apple ISO 9660 Extensions

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
	This redirect is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Apple Inc.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc.

Is a comparison with FAT really relevant? As I understand, FAT is only used nowadays in portable media devices (MP3/4 players, cameras, etc). NTFS on the other hand, can store metadata, alternate streams, extra properties, previous versions, etc.

Neither FAT, HFS or NTFS are directly used as CD formats, so such comparisons are irrelevant - surely this article should be describing the purpose, design and usage of these extensions? 93.97.30.204 (talk) 12:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply