Talk:Anglican Journal

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anglican Journal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120164116/http://www.anglicanjournal.com/100/article/journal-wins-17-awards/ to http://www.anglicanjournal.com/100/article/journal-wins-17-awards/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Beta Beta Beta (talk) 02:05, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that a 151-year-old newspaper lost its journalistic independence in 2026 and became a corporate communications organ?

• Source: 'The Anglican Journal, the 151-year-old official newspaper of the Anglican Church of Canada’s will drop its journalistic commitments and focus on church communications, ensuring that its writing “unequivocally supports the mission of the church.”' (The Living Church) 'The 151-year-old paper will no longer publish journalism, but will ensure that writing in the Journal “unequivocally supports the mission of the church.” At a June 12 meeting of the Council of the General Synod... the group of about 30 people voted unanimously to make the Anglican Journal “the voice of the Anglican Church of Canada and part of its larger communications strategy rather than a separate journalistic enterprise.”... Tomlinson is paraphrased as adding that it is no longer possible to sustain the tension between corporate communications and independent journalism, a situation he said came with potential institutional risks that could not be effectively managed.' (Broadview magazine)

• • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Olimpia Fulvia Morata

5x expanded by Dclemens1971 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 64 past nominations.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:57, 17 July 2026 (UTC).

• Oh, I hate that. And even the church announcement reads like corporate newspeak. On topic, article is new enough and long enough. Hook fact is interesting. Copyvio tool shows only proper nouns, so no close paraphrasing concerns. No image to review. QPQ is done.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:09, 18 July 2026 (UTC)