This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Latest comment: 8 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi -- I have tagged the section added by User:Vallee as potentially LLM-generated. The diff, and many of their other contributions, displays several AI writing tells and their userpage is a giveaway they use it for at least some things. I have not removed the content as this is not proof, but it needs fact checking, and then a rewrite for non-neutral tone (in that order). Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:44, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi,
I was offline for some time.
Yes, indeed, I used AI for translations, proofing, and for wiki-formatting.
However, I did it on the basis of serious scientific articles (mostly sciencedirect, JSTOR, or books), which I always referenced correctly. Before hitting the post button, I always checked if the data is accurate.
It was in a phase during which I made a lot of QGIS maps, and was frustrated by the emptyness of the corresponding pages, which I wanted to populate with accurate, retracable information.
