Talk:Adina Mosque

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2019 and 11 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Abeerelwahsh.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Encyclopedia Iranica

how credible is the citation of encyclopedia iranica and why is iranian source used in the topic covering bengali architecture? i feel there is a load of BS and iranian/persian propaganda material being used in the article.Rameezraja001 (talk) 05:49, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Adina Masjid is made on Adinath Temple

why wrong information is on Wikipedia. 103.217.231.82 (talk) 18:03, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

a mosque will never incorporate images of gods in it. basically the article has completely ignored any possibility of the mosque being built on a destroyed temple. ASI on its board of information clearly states that it was built on ruins of a temple. but whats the need to do any research. just write whatever suits the narrative.. ~2025-35134-03 (talk) 14:08, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Kirtimukha

Kirtimukha

• Odisha Ver.
• West Bengal Ver.

Interesting Bongan^® →TalkToMe← 15:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

@Cerium4B has repeatedly deleted[][][] 2 verified images Mihrab[] and Kirtimukha[] without a valid reason. I called him to the talk page[], but he continued removing the images. After my edit warning, he restored one image[]. I don't understand why he has made so many unconstructive edits to this page. Bongan^® →TalkToMe← 18:07, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

I’ve already explained why I’ve removed those images. — Cerium4B—Talk? • 18:10, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Those are irrelevant images for an article of a mosque.

I’ve just asked some wp:rs. Search and add them, none is stopping you. — Cerium4B—Talk? • 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

I’ve restored this because it was mistakenly removed by me while removing your irrelevant image. Not because of your illogical warning on my talk page. — Cerium4B—Talk? • 18:29, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Evidence of Kirtimukha Motifs at Adina Mosque

The image of Kirtimukha at Adina Mosque was removed from the article without proper research. It is clearly visible in @Amitabha Gupta's image on the main mihrab to the right of the Singhasan when zoomed in. In @Bhaskar Ghosh's Singhasan image, it appears at the center when zoomed in. In @Paramanu Sarkar's image, it is visible without zooming. All these images provide clear evidence of Kirtimukha motifs and artwork at Adina Mosque.

main mihrab by Amitabha Gupta

Singhasan by Bhaskar Ghosh

Kirtimukha motifs by Paramanu Sarkar

Kirtimukha motifs by Agniswar Kansabanik

Bongan^® →TalkToMe← 18:03, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

It’s not a kirtimukha.

Provide some reliable sources to prove your claim. — Cerium4B—Talk? • 13:49, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

It's a shiva temple

It's shiva mandir. During mughal invading period, the top layers had razed and rebuilt as mosque. We having many proofs, inscriptions and symbols to prove that this a temple ~2026-44333-2 (talk) 05:52, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Article being defaced

@UserNumber and Greys hound: Hello, I’ve noticed what appears to be Hindutva conspiracy theory POV pushing on this page that is affecting its neutrality and overall quality, undermining the reliability of the article. Could you please take a look and help address this? Ayushkalin (talk) 06:17, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Do you think the citations from the 1800s archeological books I've put there... were related to Hindutwa perspective? Neutrality should not be one sided. The current version doesn't mention a word regarding the older establishment, rendering it factually false. I had also detailed the ongoing debate and trials in the post-2000 section, that too has been removed. So who is undermining the reliability here? Greys hound (talk) 20:48, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

All the comments from the archeologists should be retained. The current development on the matter should be retained. Few lines where it explicitly claims about the name Adinatha can be edited to maintain NPOV. One sided NPOV hypocrisy should not be promoted. Greys hound (talk) 20:54, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Fully protected

Due to edit-warring the page has been fully protected for three days. Please discuss here to establish consensus for inclusion or exclusion of the disputed content. Resumption of edit-warring after protection expires will likely result in further sanctions; editors are reminded that this page falls within a contentious topic. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:46, 1 April 2026 (UTC)