Talk:50s BC

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Intertranswiki/OKA

This article has been created, improved, or expanded by a translator from the Open Knowledge Association. See the OKA task force page of WikiProject Intertranswiki.Intertranswiki/OKAWikipedia:WikiProject Intertranswiki/OKATemplate:WikiProject Intertranswiki/OKAOKA

53BC

Disregard, it seems the problem has been fixed and I didn't realize it.

Does the lead really need to be rewritten?

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've looked at some of the other BC decade articles, and it looks like the short, purely discriptive format prevails throughout (probably because so few things are typically listed). I don't think it makes any sense to only rewrite this article's lead, so should we:

Leave this lead as it is, or
Rewrite every lead for every decade with a similar lead (This article concerns the period...), which seems to be most (if not every) decade prior to 0s BC?

I personally prefer option 1. Ships & Space_(Edits) 16:28, 25 March 2025 (UTC)Reply