Draft talk:The87press

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
Low	This draft has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This draft is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This draft has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This page should not be speedy deleted as unreviewed LLM content, because... (hi, I’d like to very respectfully contest the speedy deletion nomination. I'm so sorry for the trouble here. I understand why the earlier version raised concerns with its false citations. I've since re-done all sources and shrunk the article to a much shorter and, as a goal, more conservative version. I take full responsibility for the mess I made here and that it's completely my fault. I greatly appreciate the time it takes to review these pages. As it is now, I don't think this new version meets G15, but I understand and support any outcome. thanks very much for reviewing it, and apologies for the extra work.) --Merquill (talk) 17:30, 28 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Merquill I went ahead and declined the speedy as there are not currently any fake references. That said, the article still is not suitable for mainspace so I have draftified it. Most of the sources you cite are not independent. You need to find sources that talk about The87press at some length. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 22:45, 28 April 2026 (UTC)Reply