Jump to content

Draft talk:Friendly Captcha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 days ago by Robertoalencar in topic Source assessment

Source assessment

[edit]
Source assessment table
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
Räth (2023), "Captcha-Konkurrent aus Bayern", Gründerszene / Business Insider Deutschland
~ no founder quotes, but published the day after the award Yes established startup and business outlet with editorial oversight Yes entire article is about the company ~ Maybe
Pohl (2023), "Kampfansage an die Datenkrake Google", Süddeutsche Zeitung
~ staff journalist’s own feature, not press-release based, but much of it is founder quotes Yes local section of a major national newspaper Yes entire article is about the company and its founder ~ Maybe
Weck (2023), "Deutscher Gründerpreis 2023: Das Startup und die Aufsteiger des Jahres", t3n
~ wording matches the award organiser’s material Yes established German tech magazine ~ one paragraph in a roundup of award winners ~ Maybe
Armbruster (2024), "Mann mit Vision", IHK-Magazin
No chamber of commerce members’ magazine ~ institutional magazine ~ long, but about half is the founder’s biography ✘ No
Manivannan et al. (2024), "mCaptcha: …", Communications of the ACM 67(10)
~ authors built a competing CAPTCHA Yes peer-reviewed ACM publication No one column in a comparison table ✘ No
"I'm not a robot: CAPTCHAs und digitale Barrierefreiheit", BFIT-Bund, p. 7
Yes government body, no connection to the company Yes official government portal No named as an example; survey count only ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Robertoalencar (talk) 08:54, 20 October 2026 (UTC)Reply