Draft talk:Alejandro Vilca
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 7 years ago by PatGallacher
| This draft must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the draft and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this draft, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
I quote WP:POLITICIAN: "The following are presumed to be notable: Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office, and members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature." So it looks to me as if Argentine provincial deputies are inherently notable. Not disputing that this article could be improved, but it looks as if it passes the notability guideline already. PatGallacher (talk) 01:18, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
I'm getting a bit confused. Stevey7788 seems to now accept that this person is inherently notable, but Mgbo120 does not. Any advice? PatGallacher (talk) 13:57, 23 March 2019 (UTC)