Draft:Nekoweb
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 6 July 2026 by ChloeDrowssap (talk). This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
Declined by ChloeDrowssap 3 months ago.
|
Comment: Also, these are all primary sources. You need some secondary sources to demonstrate significant coverage. in solidarity, Chloe (talk) 13:57, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
| Registration | Yes |
|---|
Nekoweb is a free static web hosting service launched in 2024.[1] The purpose for this service is so people could express themselves freely, considering social media too much limiting. It's similar to Neocities.[2]
It's run entirely by donations from users. Donators have donator perks.
On March 8 2026, Nekoweb was incorporated into Kicya as part of their services.
Features
[edit]Users can set a RSS feeds on their websites to be read by Nekoweb for posts to be shown on a global feeds page. Users can follow other users to add new posts on their RSS feeds to a personal feed page.
Nekoweb have an explore page to discover other users' websites.
Nekoweb have SSI support.[3]
References
[edit]- ↑ "Support Nekoweb in Keeping the Internet of the 2000's Alive" (Press release). Retrieved April 10, 2026.
- ↑ "Nekoweb". IndieWeb. Retrieved August 5, 2026.
- ↑ "SSI (Server-Side Includes) - nekoweb.org". nekoweb.org. Retrieved June 17, 2026.

- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements and
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight and
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.