Draft:Janina Rossiter
This draft reads like a resume or curriculum vitae. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a professional networking website or a place to promote yourself or your services. We also strongly discourage writing about yourself.
Articles about people must meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 26 June 2025 by WikiMentor01 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by WikiMentor01 14 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 14 June 2025 by JesusisGreat7 (talk). This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.
Declined by JesusisGreat7 15 months ago.Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. |
This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.
Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by 331dot 15 months ago.
|
This draft lacks inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. We require inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement.
Declined by Tarlby 15 months ago.You must place an inline citation directly after:
Please edit your draft to support your statements with inline citations. Learn how to create inline citations in the:
|
Submission declined on 25 May 2025 by Jannatulbaqi (talk). This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Jannatulbaqi 15 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 25 May 2025 by AlphaBetaGamma (talk). This draft lacks inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. We require inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement.
Declined by AlphaBetaGamma 15 months ago.You must place an inline citation directly after:
Please edit your draft to support your statements with inline citations. Learn how to create inline citations in the:
|
Submission declined on 25 May 2025 by HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by HickoryOughtShirt?4 15 months ago.
|
Comment: The draft relies heavily on primary sources and press mentions and it reads like a résumé. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 18:00, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Awards only contribute to notability if the award itself merits an article, like Nobel Prize for Literature or Pulitzer Prize. Awards for your books might merit your books articles, but not necessarily you yourself.This still reads like a resume- because it is you telling about your work and accomplishments, and not an independent editor summarizing what independent reliable sources have chosen on their own to say about you. You list mentions in media- instead of just listing it, this draft should summarize what those mentions say about you and what makes you a notable creative professional. 331dot (talk) 10:29, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Please cite reliable sources for all claims so readers can verify the article's content before you resubmit. Thank you. Tarlby (t) (c) 21:56, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Comment: See WP:REFBOMB. You actually have too many references here, probably because this reads as your resume. Any article about you needs to summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about you and what makes you a notable creative professional or more broadly a notable person. You have too many sources and yet have unsourced sections of the article- this tells me your approach here is, to be frank, all wrong. 331dot (talk) 19:30, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Not enough sources as well. Please ensure every sentence has a source. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:24, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Janina Rossiter | |
|---|---|
Janina Rossiter in 2022 | |
| Born | May 1981 (age 45) |
| Occupation | Environmental artivist |
| Known for | Ocean-themed art and environmental children's books |
| Notable work | 123 Who's Cleaning the Sea?, Mangrove |
| Awards | Artist of the Year – Wild Spaces (2021), Book Excellence Award |
| Website | www |
Janina Rossiter is a French–German author, artist and environmental activist. Her work focuses on ocean conservation and climate awareness.
Early life and education
[edit]Rossiter was born in 1981.
Career
[edit]Rossiter is the author of a number of books including the Tovi the Penguin series and 1, 2, 3, Who’s Cleaning the Sea?
Illustrations from her book 1, 2, 3, Who’s Cleaning the Sea? appeared in the 2022 “Art for Change” section at the ChangeNOW Summit in Paris.
In 2025, she served as a judge of the Welsh NGO and Coldplay launch creative competition.[1]
Awards and honors
[edit]The illustration Mangrove was awarded Sketch for Survival – Wild Spaces Artist of the Year at the Explorers Against Extinction awards, held at the Royal Geographical Society in London.[2]
Her book 1, 2, 3, Who’s Cleaning the Sea? was named runner-up in the Arts category at the P.E.A. (People. Environment. Achievement.) Awards for its environmental impact.[3]
Possible sources
[edit]She has been profiled in Hamburger Abendblatt[4], and Lemon Magazine[5] for her environmental art and activism.
EZDIVE Magazine (Issue 102) published a feature titled “Artivism: The Artists and Artwork Fighting for Ocean Conservation,” which included an interview with Rossiter and images of her work.[6]
Critical reception
[edit]The Hamburger Abendblatt published an article on Rossiter’s participation at the COP26 in Glasgow, where her artwork Mangrove was included in the “Sketch for Survival” initiative supporting climate and wildlife conservation.[4]
United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development – special Issue ECO Magazine featured Rossiter in Chapter Seven of its Ecosystem Diaries series, produced by The Marine Diaries in collaboration with the United Nations’ UN Ocean Decade initiative. The article, titled “Giving Our Ocean a Voice,” discussed her use of visual art in marine conservation.[7]
Lemon Magazine (Issue 22) ran a six-page feature titled “Artivism: Drawing for the Ocean,” focusing on Rossiter’s educational art initiatives and her approach to visual storytelling for environmental causes. The article appeared in the magazine’s summer edition.[5]
References
[edit]- ↑ "Welsh NGO and Coldplay launch creative competition". West Wales Chronicle. 30 January 2025. Retrieved 27 May 2025.
- ↑ "Explorers Against Extinction – 2021 Award Winners". 20 November 2021. Retrieved 25 May 2025.
- ↑ "P.E.A. Awards 2024 – Runners-up Listing". 9 July 2024. Retrieved 25 May 2025.
- 1 2 "Umweltschutz: Mangrovenbild einer Hamburgerin auf dem Klimagipfel in Glasgow" [Environmental protection: A Hamburg woman's picture of mangroves at the climate summit in Glasgow]. Hamburger Abendblatt. 12 November 2021. Retrieved 25 May 2025.
- 1 2 "Lemon Magazine Issue 22 – Summer 2024". My Lemon Magazine. Retrieved 25 May 2025.
- ↑ "EZDIVE 102". EZDIVE Magazine. Retrieved 25 May 2025.
- ↑ "Giving Our Ocean a Voice – ECO Magazine". ECO Magazine. Retrieved 25 May 2025.
External links
[edit]- Official website
- "ChangeNOW 2022 – Live Interview (timestamp: 4h23min)". YouTube. 6 May 2022. Retrieved 25 May 2025.
- "ChangeNOW 2024 coverage". YouTube. 12 August 2024. Retrieved 25 May 2025.</ref>

- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.