Draft:Floodhacking

Submission declined on 23 April 2026 by DoubleGrazing (talk).

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by DoubleGrazing 4 months ago. Last edited by DoubleGrazing 4 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 30 March 2026 by Theroadislong (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Theroadislong 5 months ago.

Comment: Press releases do not establish notability. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:27, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Comment: three sections still entirely unsourced. Theroadislong (talk) 07:19, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Comment: largely unsourced? Theroadislong (talk) 21:15, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Comment: In accordance with Wikipedia's Conflict of interest guideline, I disclose that I have a conflict of interest regarding the subject of this article. Rnpuntalara (talk) 16:40, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

FloodHacking is an online community-based initiative focused on reporting and documenting online scams and potentially harmful digital activities, particularly on messaging platforms and social networks.

Overview

FloodHacking operates as a decentralized network of contributors who identify, track, and report suspected fraudulent or abusive online behavior. The initiative is primarily oriented toward raising awareness about cyber threats and encouraging users to report suspicious content.

History

FloodHacking emerged as an online project dedicated to monitoring digital fraud and scam-related activities. It developed through online communities interested in cybersecurity awareness and public reporting of harmful online practices.

Over time, the initiative gained limited media attention through coverage in online publications discussing grassroots efforts to combat online scams and improve digital safety.

Activities

The activities associated with FloodHacking include the identification of phishing schemes, impersonation attempts, and other forms of online fraud. Participants contribute by sharing information about suspicious accounts, websites, or digital campaigns.

The initiative also distributes informational content intended to educate internet users about common scam techniques and online safety practices.

Media coverage

FloodHacking has been covered by a number of online media outlets in relation to online fraud monitoring and community-driven cybersecurity efforts.

An article published by Inter Press Service described FloodHacking as part of a broader ecosystem of digital watchdog initiatives addressing online scams and illicit online activity.^[1]

According to Daily Trust, the initiative has been involved in tracking and reporting fraudulent activity on digital platforms, highlighting the role of independent communities in identifying harmful online behavior.^[2]

Coverage by The Hans India has also referenced FloodHacking in connection with efforts to detect online abuse and digital fraud.^[3]

According to Yahoo Finance, the initiative reported removing thousands of groups associated with illegal activities on messaging platforms.^[4]

References

[1] "FloodHacking Organization: The Digital Watchdog That Has Spent Six Years Cleaning up What Platforms Left Behind". 30 March 2026.

[2] "FloodHacking Organization: The Six-Year Investigation into What Happens when Platforms Fail to Police Themselves".

[3] "How FloodHacking Organization Became One of the Most Effective Forces Against Online Child Abuse and Digital Fraud". 30 July 2025.

[4] ttps://finance.yahoo.com/sectors/technology/articles/floodhacking-organization-removed-over-10-093000607.html

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]